Tool 02

From one race to the next

Tools

Race time predictor

Take a recent race and project it onto other distances, using the Riegel formula — the same one behind most online predictors, just with the fine print attached.

:
:
DistanceProjected timePace

Where it bends: the formula assumes you're as prepared for the target distance as for the one you raced. The bigger the jump, the more flattering it gets — a 10K time projects a marathon you can only run if you've actually done the marathon training. Treat the long projections as a best case, not a promise.

Under the hood

Take a time you have actually run, and the tool assumes your times over other distances follow a smooth curve from it. Double the distance and you do not double the time — you go a bit slower per kilometre. How much slower is one number, and that number carries the whole tool.

Riegel's endurance equation predicted time = your time × (target distance ÷ your distance) 1.07732

The exponent is the interesting part. At exactly 1.0 you would hold the same pace forever; the amount above 1.0 is how fast you fade as the distance grows.

The numbers that go in

NumberWhat it isWhere it comes from
1.07732the fade exponentRiegel (1981), Table 1, "Running, men". His figure for women is 1.08283.
230 minthe outer edge of what he fittedRiegel again — above this, he writes, the curve starts bending upward.

You will see 1.06 in most online predictors. That is not Riegel's running figure: in his own table 1.05–1.06 is what he found for men aged 40 to 70. We used 1.06 too, until we read the paper. Using his running value makes this tool slightly more conservative, which given what follows is the right direction.

What it was built on, and why that matters to you. Riegel fitted this to world records — people at their absolute best, over races lasting 3.5 to 129 minutes. He is direct about the limits: "I have avoided extrapolation beyond the limits of the endurance range because of the obvious pitfalls." When a prediction lands beyond that range, we mark the row rather than hand you a confident-looking time.

Someone checked it on people like us. Vickers and Vertosick (2016) ran it against 2,303 recreational runners: up to and including the half marathon it holds up well. At the marathon it does not — for half of those runners the prediction was at least ten minutes too fast, and for a quarter of them more than twenty. So: trust it to the half, treat the marathon line as a best case that assumes you have done the marathon training.

Put this calculator on your own site

Club site, blog, coaching page — paste the snippet below where you want the calculator. It loads from enduranceproof.com, sizes itself to fit, and links back here for the method, the sources and where it bends. Free. It sets no cookies and measures nothing on your page.

Platform strips scripts? Use the plain frame instead — it just won't resize itself: <iframe src="https://enduranceproof.com/tools/embed/race-predictor" title="Race time predictor — EnduranceProof" width="100%" height="479" style="border:0" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Putting it on a club or coaching site? Full instructions, the other five calculators and the terms — it stays free.

Want the next one when it lands?

One email when a new tool or write-up is finished, and not otherwise.

No spam, never shared, one click to leave.

Why a lab percentage is not a finishing-time percentage — read the shoe check.